Get Involved
About Us
Our Members


Past and Present


 Click here for PDF

The Hawaiian Islands were first settled by Polynesians around 1200 CE.1 The “discovery” of Hawai'i, and with it its flora, fauna, people, and customs, generally is attributed to the British explorer James Cook (1728–1779) in 1778, even though it has been argued that the Spanish captain Ruy López de Villalobos may have been the first European to set foot on Hawai'i in the 16th century.2

This article reviews the traditional and modern uses of plants in the genus Pipturus Wedd. (Urticaceae), which occur from the Mascarene Islands in the Indian Ocean to the South Pacific via Austro-Malaysia. Specifically, this article focuses on four endemic Pipturus species that are collectively known as “māmaki” and found on the Hawaiian Islands.* Māmaki is commonly used for fiber, and its use in local native traditional medicine is documented in locations throughout the genus’ vast range. In recent years, commercial cultivation, primarily of P. albidus (Hook. & Arn.) A.Gray ex H.Mann, has yielded local tea and beverage products that are now marketed throughout the United States.3,4 Apart from historical accounts, there is a paucity of data in the public domain on Pipturus chemistry and pharmacology, leaving traditional medicinal uses largely uncorroborated.4 It is hoped that the data presented in this article may trigger further biopharmaceutical research and development of these interesting botanicals.

Discovery and Nomenclature

What is known today as the genus Pipturus emerged from several nomenclatural revisions of the Urticaceae family. French botanist Antoine Laurent de Jussieu (1748–1836) grouped multiple genera under Urticaceae in 1789 — including Artocarpus Forst., Boehmeria Jacq., Cannabis L., Cecropia L., Elatostema Forst., Forsskaolea L., Humulus L., Morus L., Parietaria L., ProcrisCommers., Pteranthus Forssk., Theligonum L., and Urtica L. — and is attributed with the authority of the family.5

French botanist Charles Gaudichaud-Beaupré (1789–1854) revised the Urticaceae family in French naval officer Louis de Freycinet’s (1779–1842) Voyage autour du monde, entrepris par ordre du roi. Exécuté sur les corvettes de S.M. l’Uranie et la Physicienne, pendant les années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820.6 It may be here where the first mention of “māmaki” was made and attributed to members of the genera Boehmeria and Procris, which occur on the Sandwich Islands (Hawai'i). De Freycinet’s publication also may have included the first description of Boehmeria dioica, which British botanists William Jackson Hooker (1785–1865) and George Arnott Walker-Arnott (1799–1868) redescribed and placed in the genus Boehmeria (as Boehmeria albida Hook. & Arn.) in The Botany Of Captain Beechey’s Voyage.7

Further revising the Urticaceae family, Anglo-French botanist Hugh Algernon Weddell (1819–1877) introduced the genus Pipturus in 18548 and included B. albida as Pipturus taitensis Wedd. Later, American botanist Horace Mann Jr. (1844–1868) corrected Weddell, noting that “the name Taitensis, given by Weddell, is wholly inappropriate for a plant entirely unknown to Tahiti.” Mann also compared his own collection with that of American botanist Asa Gray (1810–1888) from the United States Exploring Expedition under American explorer Charles Wilkes (1798–1877).9,10 Weddell’s treatment of the Urticaceae family in French-Swiss botanist Alphonse Pyramus de Candolle’s (1806–1893) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis lists eight species of Pipturus, including P. albidus under its hitherto accepted name.11

It was a different species of the genus, Pipturus argenteus Wedd. — initially classified as Urtica argentea G. Forst. — that was first mentioned in the literature. The journal of Cook’s first voyage (1768–1771) described “a frutescent nettle; the urtica argentea, called Erowa” as growing on Otaheite (Tahiti). “[A]nd of the bark of the Erowa, a kind of nettle which grows in the mountains, and is therefore rather scarce, they make the best fishing lines in the world,” the journal noted.12 The plant was described by Swedish naturalist Daniel Solander (1733–1782), sketched by Scottish artist Sydney Parkinson (1745–1771), and its Latin binomial appropriated by German naturalist Georg Forster (1754–1794) as his own.13 English botanist and naturalist Sir Joseph Banks (1743–1820), who accompanied Cook on his first voyage, included a color engraving of P. argenteus (Urtica argentea), which was based on Parkinson’s depiction, in Banks’ Florilegium (plate 656, 1769, Figure 1).

Whether Pipturus species were collected on Hawai'i during Cook’s third voyage in 1779 is uncertain, as the botanical collection made by David Nelson (d. 1789) in a five-day expedition in which he attempted to climb Mauna Loa (Hawai'i) is poorly documented.12Nelson left no journal, and the approximately 130 specimens he collected were deposited in the British Museum of Natural History without further ado.14,15 An effort was made to identify Nelson’s specimens, but māmaki was not among them.16

Multiple authors agree that Pipturus on Hawai'i is highly variable and difficult to classify.17-20 Austrian-American botanist Joseph Francis Rock (1884–1962) put it into even more drastic terms, stating that P. albidus “is a most variable species, and if one should undertake to separate the various forms, one would have to name individual trees.18 According to The World Flora Online database, the genus Pipturus includes a total of 34 species. In a 1970 paper, Nicharat and Gillett stated that the genus contained approximately 49 recognized species, 21 of which were said to occur on Hawai'i. They also noted that all species were members of the section Mamakea, which are characterized by sessile flowers in axillary clusters (as opposed to elongated spikes in the section Pipturus).21

Wagner et al (1990) reduced the number of distinct Pipturus species to four (all endemic to the islands of Hawai'i), relegating formerly recognized species into synonyms (Table 1).22 At the time of Wagner et al’s writing, P. albidus occurred on all Hawaiian islands except Ni‘ihau and Kaho‘olawe; P. forbesii occurred on Maui only; and P. kauaiensis and P. ruber occurred on Kaua‘i only. Due to commercialization efforts, this is likely no longer the case. Both Wagner et al and Nicharat and Gillett agree that the Hawaiian Pipturus species all may have evolved from a single colonizer. Nicharat and Gillett also described ready hybridization, which further complicates accurate botanical identification and attribution, especially as the species no longer are separated geographically.21Danish botanist Ib Friis, in his 1993 treatment of the Urticaceae family, pointed out the need for a revision of the genus.23

Welch (1998) contested the endemism of P. albidus and recorded it as present in the Society Islands (specifically, Tahiti),24 which is supported by French botanist Emmanuel Drake del Castillo (1893),25 even though the accounts appear not to be overly reliable. In fact, Skottsberg (1932) had already addressed reports of P. albidus from Tahiti, Samoa, Papua New Guinea, New Caledonia, and the Philippines, and identified all of those as distinct species.26


Pipturus species are used throughout the genus’ entire habitat (Table 2).30-103

Chemical, Pharmacological, and Toxicological Investigations

Despite the abundance of ethnobotanical records, phytochemical and pharmacological investigations of Pipturus species are scarce and primarily focused on three species: P. arborescens, P. argenteus, and P. albidus.

  1. arborescens

Pipturus arborescens is native to China, Taiwan, Japan, Borneo, and the Philippines. In phytochemical studies, dichloromethane extracts of the twigs yielded ursolic acid, oleanolic acid, friedelin, b-sitosterol, and stigmasterol, and extracts of the leaves were found to contain b-sitosterol, stigmasterol, squalene, and polyprenol.104 These compounds may contribute to the cytotoxic effects observed in studies of various human cancer cell lines.105

In another laboratory study, crude methanolic extracts of P. arborescens leaves yielded the triterpenes glutinone, friedelin, and glutinol. Further, three sterols were identified (campesterol, stigmasterol, and sitosterol). Glutinone exhibited significant antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a weaker activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Friedelin and glutinol showed no antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa.106

  1. argenteus

Ethanolic and methanolic extracts of the inner bark of P. argenteus displayed selective activity against breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and have been shown to be effective butyrylcholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (> 80%) and possible NMDA receptor antagonists.103

Nick et al (1995) conducted a preliminary screening for antimicrobial activity against E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus luteus, and Penicillium oxalicum and molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria glabrata, as well as a brine shrimp toxicity assay. A methanolic extract of P. argenteus showed no activity/toxicity in any of the assays, except for inhibition of tyrosine-specific protein kinase of epidermal growth factor receptor (41% at 50 µg/mL).107

Researchers have also investigated the antioxidant activity of P. argenteus. Scientists have reported radical scavenging activity of a P. argenteus root extract (73.7% inhibition at 14 µg/mL) and bark extract (84.2% inhibition at 35 µg/mL) using a DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay.108 Antioxidant activity also was shown for various P. argenteus leaf and bark extracts (ethanolic, ethyl acetate, and hexane) in DPPH, ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), and total phenolic content (TPC) assays.109

Two patent filings in Japan suggest that P. argenteus is or was being considered as a potential skin care ingredient based on its reported active oxygen-scavenging action (for skin aging products) and/or its inhibition of hyaluronidase activity and melamine production (for skin pigmentation products). However, the former patent has expired, and the latter either has been refused or is still pending.110,111

  1. albidus

An investigation of the presence of alkaloids in 71 samples of Hawaiian plants, including P. albidus, showed no precipitates in either hydrochloric acid or ammonium hydroxide.112

Three phenolic acids ((+)-catechin, chlorogenic acid, and rutin) with antioxidant activity have been isolated from P. albidus leaves. The total antioxidant activity of P. albidus leaves, however, was found to be relatively low compared to green and black teas (Camellia sinensis, Theaceae).113,114

The same authors investigated the nutrient and mineral composition of dried P. albidus leaves. Results are summarized in Table 3. The comparatively high calcium content in māmaki infusions is noteworthy.115

Another study identified eight phenolic compounds in māmaki infusions, with three caffeoylquinic acids and two flavonol glycosides being the major compounds. In the phenolic fractions, chlorogenic acid and its isomers and rutin, but not (+)-catechin, were found.116

Acetonitrile, methanolic, and aqueous extracts of P. albidus bark, leaf, and stem have shown antiviral activities against herpes simplex virus 1 and 2, vesicular stomatitis virus, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1); antimicrobial activity against S. aureusand Streptococcus pyogenes; antifungal activity against Microsporum canis, Trichophyton rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum; and anti-complement activities.117,118

Another study investigated māmaki’s antioxidant, chemopreventive, and anticancer activities. In the FRAP assay, māmaki tea exhibited a value of 40 µM/µg Trolox equivalent. Tea samples also were assessed for inhibitory activity against nitric oxide production, NF-kB activation, and proliferation of two cancer cell lines. NF-kB inhibition ranged between 60% and 75% among samples tested. Nitric oxide inhibition ranged just below 60%. Most samples were largely inactive in the cancer cell lines (> 80% survival at 20 µg/mL); only treatment with an ethanolic extract from dehydrated leaves resulted in a survival rate of 71.3%.119

A patent filing in Germany, Israel, and the United States suggests the use of P. albidus in a formula for hair and scalp treatment; the application is pending.120

Commercialization and Regulatory Status

Product overview

More than 20 brands of dried māmaki tea are sold in Hawai'i through retail grocery and natural grocery stores, specialty hospitality stores, farmers markets, and e-commerce (Table 4). Most of these products are flavored with mint (Mentha spp., Lamiaceae), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus, Poaceae), cacao (Theobroma cacao, Malvaceae), or other local flavorings, but about one third of the dried tea (by volume) is sold as unflavored pure māmaki. The māmaki industry has gained a notable foothold within the last seven years or so.

Ready-to-drink bottled māmaki tea (e.g., Shaka Tea) is by far the dominant product type currently sold. Retail sales of Shaka Tea, which recently was acquired by King’s Hawaiian (Torrance, California), are expected to surpass $10 million in 2022. Shaka’s processing facility in Hilo, Hawai'i, receives fresh māmaki leaves from more than 20 suppliers, the largest being Ancient Valley Growers and Hawaii Forest Farms. Intake volume at the Hilo facility is close to 1,000 pounds per week, which results in about 200 pounds of dried māmaki leaf for brewing and bottling per week (personal communication with Grant Ferrier).

Cultivation Efforts

Until the early 2000s, māmaki and some other Hawaiian botanical resources were sourced largely from wild collection. A 2003 US Department of Agriculture (USDA) small business research grant supported the development of an organic Hawaiian herbal tea industry on a 25-acre experimental māmaki farm (Māmaki Farm Research). The farm, located near Hilo and owned by Kini Po-Po Creations, Inc. (Hilo, Hawai'i), resulted in full commercialization of certified organic māmaki from cultivation by 2006.138 More recently, both academic research139 and issuance of USDA Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) small business grants140 reflect a growing interest in overcoming limitations in māmaki cultivation. To the present day, cultivation of māmaki has experienced steady growth. Conventional cultivation still prevails. The USDA Organic Integrity Database currently lists seven National Organic Program (NOP)-certified farming enterprises growing māmaki in Hawai'i.141

International Market Access

A highly heterogeneous international regulatory landscape governs market access for botanical ingredients and products. While regulatory categories (e.g., for foods, supplements, medicines, and cosmetics) may appear similar, the intricacies of compliance, based on national laws, can vary widely and generally are determined by the intended use.144 Market access for food ingredients may be comparatively simple, provided the ingredient is a (traditional) food and no specific health claims (other than nutritional benefits) are made. The more far-reaching the claim, the more onerous regulatory compliance becomes. Certain health benefits can be achieved outside the treatment category through unsupervised self-medication. Such products may consequently fit into the supplement category, whereas claims associated with the treatment of serious diseases typically belong to the drug category. It is important to understand these regulations and their requirements because regulatory barriers can be forbidding, and compliance may be a lengthy and costly process. On the other hand, while regulations provide a safe framework to operate within, with a sufficient degree of understanding they also hold opportunity.

Having been present in the United States as both a food ingredient and a traditional medicine, there are no obvious limitations for marketing māmaki in food and dietary supplement categories, as it is clearly “grandfathered” in both. Any structure-function claims associated with its use in dietary supplements, however, would need to be substantiated with sufficient traditional use and/or clinical evidence.

By comparison, introducing māmaki in the EU/United Kingdom would be considerably more complicated due to its historical absence in these markets. In the food and food supplement categories, it would be considered as novel food and require notification to and assessment by competent health and regulatory authorities.145 As a medicine that lacks traditional use evidence from within the EU/UK, it could be marketed only as a botanical drug, which would require full market authorization — an unlikely status, given the limited data corroborating its reported activities.146,147


Māmaki is an underused botanical ingredient with substantial market potential, both in terms of prospective health and nutritional benefits (based on its traditional use) and a supply chain that is relatively easy to scale up. However, the genus is poorly documented, and a taxonomic review to enable more accurate species differentiation is needed, as is further scientific exploration of the chemistry and pharmacology of Pipturus species to corroborate traditional uses. Evidence from traditional use and recent commercialization efforts demonstrates māmaki’s safe use in water infusions (teas) and ready-to-drink preparations with a tonifying effect.



  1. Wilmshurst JM, Hunt TL, Lipo CP, Anderson AJ. High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(5):1815-1820.
  2. Ferreiro M. Las Islas de Sandwich o Hauaii: Descubierto por los españoles [The Sandwich Islands or Hawaii: Discovered by the Spanish]. Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica Nacional. 1877;2(1):347-349.
  3. Sugano J, Okumura L, Silva J, Uyeda J, Wang KH. Scaling Up Māmaki (Pipturus albidus) in Non-Forest Areas for Commercial Production. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Cooperative Extension; 2018.
  4. Sugano J, Saito R, Uyeda J, et al. Māmaki Research and Findings: Hawai'i’s Endemic Tea (Pipturus albidus). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Cooperative Extension; 2018.
  5. de Jussieu AL, Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita, juxta methodum in horto regio parisiensi exaratam, anno MDCCLXXIV. Paris, France: Herissant; 1789.
  6. de Freycinet LCD. Voyage autour du monde, entrepris par ordre du roi. Exécuté sur les corvettes de S.M. l’Uranie et la Physicienne, pendant les années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820, 4°, 12. Paris, France: Chez Pillet aîné; 1830.
  7. Hooker WJ and GW Arnott. The Botany of Captain Beechey’s Voyage. London, UK: Henry G. Bohn; 1841.
  8. Weddell H-A. Revue de la Famille des Urticées, in Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Quatrième Série, Botanique, Tome 1. Paris, France: Masson; 1854:173-212.
  9. Mann H. Enumeration of Hawaian plants. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Boston, MA: Welch, Bigelow & Co.; 1866.
  10. Gray A. United States Exploring Expedition. During the year 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, vol. 18 Botany, Phanerogamia, Part II. Unpublished manuscript.
  11. de Candolle AP. Prodromus sytematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, pars decima sexta, sectio prior. Paris, France: Masson; 1869.
  12. Beaglehole JC. The Journals of Captain James Cook: The Voyage of the Resolution and Discovery, 1776-1780. Vol. 3, Part 1. Cambridge, UK: Hakluyt Society; 1967.
  13. Merrill ED. The Botany of Cook’s Voyages. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica Co; 1954.
  14. John H. New species of Hawaiian plants collected by David Nelson in 1779. Pacific Science. 1976;30(1):7-44.
  15. John H. Biography of David Nelson, and an account of his botanizing in Hawaii. Pacific Science, 1976;30(1):1-5.
  16. John H. The first collection of Hawaiian plants by David Nelson in 1779. Pacific Science. 1978;32(3):315-324.
  17. Hillebrand W. Flora of the Hawaiian Islands. London, UK: Williams & Norgate; 1888.
  18. Rock JF. The Indigenous Trees of the Hawaiian Islands. Honolulu, HI: E. Herrick Brown; 1913.
  19. Skottsberg C. Pipturi soecies Hawaiiense novae. Acta Horti Gothoburgiensis. 1931;7:1-5.
  20. Skottsberg C. Vascular plants from the Hawaiian Islands. IV. Phanerogams collected during the Hawaiian Bog Survey 1938. Acta Horti Gothoburgensis. 1944;15:275-531.
  21. Nicharat S, Gillett GW. A review of the taxonomy of Hawaiian Pipturus (Urticaceae) by anatomical and cytological evidence. Brittonia. 1970;22(4):191-206.
  22. Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press; 1990.
  23. Friis I. Urticaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. Flowering Plants — Dicotyledons. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1993.
  24. Welsh SL. Flora Societensis: A Summary Revision of the Flowering Plants of the Society Islands. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University; 1998.
  25. Del Castillo E.D. Flore de la Polynésie Française: description des plantes vasculaires qui croissent spontanément ou qui sont généralement cultivées aux Iles de la Société, Marquises, Pomotou, Gambier et Wallis. Paris, France: G. Masson: 1893.
  26. Skottsberg C. Pipturus albidus’ outside the Hawaiian islands. Acta Horti Gothoburgensis. 1932;7:23-29.
  27. Krajina VJ. New Hawaiian species of Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. 1930;9(3):1-6.
  28. Léveillé H. Plantae novae sandwicenses. Repertorium novarum specierum regni vegetabilis. 1911;10(5-9):120-124.
  29. Heller AA. Observations on the ferns and flowering plants of the Hawaiian Islands. Minnesota Botanical Studies. 1897;1(10-11):814-816.
  30. Elliott WR, Jones DL. Encyclopedia of Australian Plants Suitable for Cultivation. Vol. 7. Port Melbourne, Australia: Lothian; 1997.
  31. Jiarui C, Friis I, Wilmot-Dear CM. 19. PIPTURUS Weddell, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 4, 1: 196. In: Flora of China Committee, ed. Flora of China 5. Missouri Botanical Garden: St Louis, MO; 2003.
  32. Whistler WA. Ethnobotany of the Cook Islands: The plants, their Maori names, and their uses. Allertonia. 1990;5(4):347-424.
  33. Wilder GP. Flora of Rarotonga. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 86; 1931.
  34. Bryan EH. American Polynesia and the Hawaiian Chain. Honolulu, HI: Tongg Publishing Company; 1942.
  35. Cambie RC, Ash J. Fijian Medicinal Plants.Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; 1994.
  36. Weiner MA. Secrets of Fijian Medicine. Berkley, CA: University of California, Berkley; 1984.
  37. Smith AC. Flora Vitiensis nova : a new Flora of Fiji (spermatophytes only). Vol. 2. Lawaii, HI: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden; 1996.
  38. Cambie RC, Brewis A. Anti-Fertility Plants of the Pacific. Canberra, Australia: CSRIO Publishing; 1997.
  39. McClatchey WC. The Traditional Rotuman Medicinal System and Ethnopharmacopoeia. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University; 1993.
  40. McClatchey WC. The ethnopharmacopoeia of Rotuma. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1996;50(3):147-156.
  41. Florence J. Flore de la Polynésie française. Vol. 1. Paris, France: IRD Éd; 1997.
  42. Wilder GP. The Flora of Makatea. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 120; 1934.
  43. Stone BC. The Flora of Guam. Micronesia. Vol. 6. Agana, Guam: University of Guam; 1970.
  44. Safford WE. The Useful Plants of the Island of Guam. Vol. 9. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1905.
  45. Zepernick B. Arzneipflanzen der Polynesier. Vol. 8. Berlin, Germany: Reimer; 1972.
  46. Handy ESC, Pukui MK, Livermore K. Outline of Hawaiian Physical Therapeutics. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 186; 1934.
  47. Krauss BH. Plants in Hawaiian Culture. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press; 1993.
  48. Abbott IA. La’au Hawai'i: Traditional Hawaiian Uses of Plants. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum Press; 1992.
  49. Whistler WA. Polynesian Herbal Medicine. Lawai, HI: National Tropical Botanical Garden; 1992.
  50. Chun MN, ed. Native Hawaiian Medicine. Vol. II. Honolulu, HI: First People’s Productions; 1998.
  51. Kaaiakamanu DM, Akina J. Hawaiian Herbs of Medicinal Value. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Book House; 2003.
  52. Krauss BH. Plants in Hawaiian Medicine. Honolulu, HI: Bess Press; 2001.
  53. Gutmanis J. Kahuna la’au lapa’au: The Practice of Hawaiian Herbal Medicine. Honolulu, HI: Island Heritage; 1976.
  54. Krauss BH. Ethnobotany of the Hawaiians. Honolulu, HI: Harold L. Lyon Arboretum, University of Hawaii; 1975.
  55. Māmaki. In: Hawaiian Ethnobotany Online Database. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum; 2022.
  56. Bryan WA. Natural History of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: The Hawaiian Gazette Co. 596; 1915.
  57. A Preliminary Catalogue of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum of Polynesian Ethnology and Natural History. Part 1. Honolulu, HI: Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum; 1892.
  58. Dodge CR. A Descriptive Catalogue of Useful Fiber Plants of the World. Vol. 9. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1897.
  59. Fornander A, Thrum TG. Fornander Collection Of Hawaiian Antiquities And Folk-Lore: The Hawaiians’ Account Of The Formation Of Their Islands And Origin Of Their Race, With The Traditions Of Their Migrations, Etc., As Gathered From Original Sources. Memoirs of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum of Polynesian Ethnology and Natural History. Honolulu, HI: Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum Bulletin 5; 1918-1919.
  60. Funk EJ. Anatomical Variation of Fibers in Five Genera of Hawaiian Urticaceae and its Significance to Ethnobotany. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa; 1979.
  61. Hanapi H. Ethnobotany of the Hawaiians. Honolulu, HI: Ho’omaluhia Botanical Garden; 1996.
  62. Herring E. Pipturus albidus. In: Hawaiian Native Plant Propagation Database. Honolulu, HI: College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Manoa; 2000.
  63. Hilgenkamp K, Pescaia C. Traditional Hawaiian healing and Western influence. Californian Journal of Health Promotion. 2003;1(SI):34-39.
  64. Kobayashi J. Early Hawaiian uses of medicinal plants in pregnancy and childbirth. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 1976;22(6):260-262.
  65. Koob G. Māmaki. Hawai'i Horticulture. 1999;2(11):13-14.
  66. Lennard F, Mills A. Material Approaches to Polynesian Barkcloth: Cloth, Collections, Communities. Leiden, the Netherlands: Sidestone Press; 2020.
  67. Nagata KM. Hawaiian medicinal plants. Economic Botany. 1971;25(3):245-254.
  68. Seemann B. Flora Vitiensis: A Description of the Plants of the Viti or Fiji Islands with an Account of Their History, Uses, and Properties. London, UK: Reeve & Co; 1873.
  69. Sterly J. Heilpflanzen der Einwohner Melanesiens. Hamburg, Germany: Arbeitskreis anthropologischer Wissenschaft an der Universität Hamburg; 1970.
  70. Perry LM, Metzger J. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1980.
  71. Merlin M, Capelle A, Keene T, Juvik J, Maragos J. Plants and Environments of the Marshall Islands. Honolulu, HI: East West Center; 1994.
  72. Nandwani D, DaSilva EJ. Traditional knowledge and medicine in the Marshall Islands. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech. 2003;14(4):42-46.
  73. Merlin MD, Juvik JO. Plants and Their Environments in Chuuk. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center; 1996.
  74. Glassman SF. The Flora of Ponape. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 209; 1952:1-137.
  75. Jaffré T, Morat P, Veillon J-M, Rigault F. Composition and characterisation of the native flora of New Caledonia. Documents scientifiques et techniques. 2001;1:121.
  76. Rageau J. Plantes médicinales de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Vol. 23. Paris, France: O.R.S.T.O.M; 1973
  77. Sykes WR. Contributions to the Flora of Niue. Vol. 200. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1970.
  78. Yuncker TG. The Flora of Niue Island. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 178; 1943.
  79. Fosberg FR, Falanruw MC, Sachet M-H. Vascular flora of the northern Marianas Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany. 1975;22:1-45.
  80. Raulerson L, Rinehart AF. Trees and Shrubs of the Northern Mariana Islands. Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands: Coastal Resources Management, Office of the Governor, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; 1991.
  81. Thamann RR. Ethnobotany of Pacific Island Coastal Plants. In: Morrison RJ, Geraghty PA, Crowl L, eds. Science of Pacific Island Peoples: Fauna, Flora, Food and Medicine. 3. Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies; 1994.
  82. Brown FBH. Flora of Southeastern Polynesia. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 130; 1935.
  83. Costion C. Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific, in School of Earth and Environmental Sciences. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide; 2011:332.
  84. Kocher Schmid C. Of people and plants. A botanical ethnography of Nokopo village, Madang and Morobe Provinces, Papua New Guinea. Basler Beiträge zur Ethnologie. 1991;33.
  85. Holdsworth DK. Medicinal Plants of Papua New Guinea. Noumea, New Caledonia: South Pacific Commission; 1977.
  86. Woodley E, ed. Medicinal Plants of Papua New Guinea. Part 1: Morobe Province. Weikersheim, Germany: Josef Margraf; 1991.
  87. Peekel G. Flora of the Bismarck Archipelago for Naturalists. Lae, Papua New Guinea: Office of Forests, Division of Botany; 1984.
  88. Holdsworth DK, Hurley CL, Rayner SE. Medicinal plants of New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. Science in New Guinea, 1978/79;6(2):96-104.
  89. Quisumbing E. Medicinal Plants of the Philippines. Technical Bulletin. Manila, the Philippines: Republic of the Philippines, Department of Agriculture and Commerce; 1951.
  90. Uhe G. Medicinal plants of Samoa. Economic Botany. 1974;28(1):1-30.
  91. Krämer A. Die Samoa-Inseln. Entwurf einer Monographie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung Deutsch-Samoas. II Band: Ethnographie. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 1903.
  92. Christophersen E. Flowering Plants of Samoa. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 128; 1935.
  93. Parham BEV. Plants of Samoa. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1972.
  94. Setchell WA. American Samoa: Part I. Vegetation of Tutuila Island. Part II. Ethnobotany of the Samoans. Part III. Vegetation of Rose Atoll. Vol. 20. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution for Science; 1924.
  95. Yuncker TG. Plants of the Manua Islands. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 184; 1945.
  96. Foye J. Custom Medicine in Moli District, Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands. Unpublished manuscript; 1976.
  97. Yuncker TG. Plants of Tonga. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 220; 1959.
  98. Weiner MA. Medicinal Plants of Tonga. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa; 1970.
  99. Burrows EG. Ethnology of Futuna. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 138; 1936.
  100. Burrows EG. Ethnology of Uvea. Honolulu, HI: Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 145; 1937.
  101. John H, Smith AC. The vascular plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands. Pacific Science. 1971;25:313-348.
  102. Wheatley J. A Guide to Common Trees of Vanuatu with Lists of Their Traditional Uses and Ni-Vanuatu Names. Port Vila, Vanuatu: Department of Forestry; 1992.
  103. Bradacs G. Ethnobotanical Survey and Biological Screening of Medicinal Plants from Vanuatu, in Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät. Regensburg, Germany: Universität Regensburg; 2008.
  104. Ragasa CY, Ng VAS, Ebajo Jr VD, de los Reyes MM, Mandia EH, Shen C-C. Chemical constituents of Pipturus arborescens (Link) C.B. Rob. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2014;6(6):35-42.
  105. de los Reyes MM, Oyong GG, Ebajo Jr VD, Ng VAS, Shen C-C, Ragasa CY. Cytotoxic triterpenes and sterols from Pipturus arborescens (Link) C.B. Rob. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2015;5(11):23-30.
  106. Gabona MG. Triterpenoids and other metabolites from the hexane extract of Pipturus arborescens. Manila, the Philippines: De la Salle University; 2000.
  107. Nick A, Rali T, Sticher O. Biological screening of traditional medicinal plants from Papua New Guinea. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1995;49(3):147-156.
  108. Benayad S. et al. Study of total phenolic content, anti-radical and anti-oxidant activities of two French Polynesian endemic plants: Vaccinium cereum and Pipturus argenteus., In: 5ème Congrès international de la Cosmétopée et 1ères Rencontres internationales de la Cosmétopée du Pacifique. Punaauia, French Polynesia; 2016.
  109. Clarke G. Ting KN, Wiart C, Fry J. High correlation of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, ferric reducing activity potential and total phenolics content indicates redundancy in use of all three assays to screen for antioxidant activity of extracts of plants from the Malaysian Rainforest. Antioxidants. 2013;2(1):1-10.
  110. Mitani H, Soda M, Oshima K. Melamine Production Inhibitor and Its Use. Fukuoka, Japan: Sansho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Sumitomo Forestry Co Ltd Japan; 1999.
  111. Mitani H, Soda M, Oshima K. Skin Aging Inhibitor and Its Use. Fukuoka, Japan: Sansho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Sumitomo Forestry Co Ltd Japan; 1999.
  112. Scheuer PJ, Horigan LP, Hudgins WR. A Survey for Alkaloids in Hawaiian Plants, III. Pacific Science. 1962;16(1):63-69.
  113. Kartika H. Nutrients, Polyphenols, and Total Antioxidant Activities in Māmaki, Pipturus albidus. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa; 2006.
  114. Kartika H, Li QX, Wall MM, Nakamoto ST, Iwaoka WT. Major phenolic acids and total antioxidant activity in māmaki leaves, Pipturus albidus. Journal of Food Science. 2007;72(9):S696-S701.
  115. Kartika H, Shido J, Nakamoto ST, Li QX, Iwaoka WT. Nutrient and mineral composition of dried māmaki leaves (Pipturus albidus) and infusions. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2011;24(1):44-48.
  116. Kim Y. Factors Influencing Antioxidant Phytochemical Stability of Teas. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University; 2008.
  117. Locher C, Burch MT, Mower HF, et al. Anti-microbial activity and anti-complement activity of extracts obtained from selected Hawaiian medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1995;49(1):23-32.
  118. Locher CP, Witvrouw M, de Béthune MP, et al. Antiviral activity of Hawaiian medicinal plants against human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1). Phytomedicine. 1996;2(3):259-264.
  119. Sun A, Kondratyuk T, Wongwiwatthananukit S, Sun D, Chang LC. Investigation of antioxidant, anticancer, and chemopreventive properties of Hawaiian grown māmaki tea (Pipturus albidus). Natural Product Communications. 2022;17(3):1934578X221080945.
  120. Sawdayee K, Sawdayee E. Compositions and Methods for Hair and Scalp Treatment. K Star Development KSDS Ltd Israel; 2018.
  121. Mamaki: A Unique Plant Species. Hawai'i Forest Farms website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  122. Mamaki: Traditional Hawaiian Healing. Kona Coffee & Tea website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  123. Mamaki of Hawai'i website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  124. Mamaki Tea. Hala Tree website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  125. Collections: Tea. Shaka Tea website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  126. Mamaki Native Hawaiian Herbal Tea website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  127. Miraculous Mamaki Herbal Tea. Big Island Coffee Roasters website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  128. What is Mama-Kii™ tea? Mama-Kii website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  129. Mamaki Tea | Loose Leaf Tea. Oribe Tea Company website. Available at:āmaki-loose-leaf-tea-organic/. Accessed November 7, 2022.
  130. Hawaiian Mamaki Tea. Hilo Coffee Mill website. Available at:āmakitea.aspx/. Accessed November 7, 2022.
  131. Mamaki Tea — Hawaiian Organic Caffeine Free. Nakihalani Farm website. Available at:āmaki-tea?variant=33285213388936/. Accessed November 7, 2022.
  132. Maui Rainbow Tea website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  133. 111-Hawai'i Project website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  134. Mamaki Lemongrass Hawaiian Tea. Soma Tea website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  135. Hawaiian Mamaki Tea. Yogarden website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  136. Mamaki Tea 2022 Edition. Ancient Valley Growers website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  137. Kilani Brew website. Available at: Accessed November 7, 2022.
  138. Kamiyama HS. Development of an organic Hawaiian herbal tea industry. Grant No. 2003-33610-13944.United States Department of Agriculture webiste. Available at: Accessed November 14, 2022.
  139. Okumura L, Taniguchi A, Sugano J. Use of non-circulating containers to increase transplant success in māmaki, in National Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science. HortScience. 2019;54(9S):200.
  140. Koh MW. Māmaki – Fertilization and Branch Bending Trials for Continuous Leaf Flush and Soil Fertility. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education website. Available at: Accessed November 14, 2022.
  141. Organic INTEGRITY Database. US Department of Agriculture website. Available at: Accessed November 14, 2022.
  142. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal, Canada: Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme; 2011.
  143. United Nations. Convention on Biological Diversity. Geneva, Switzerland: Interim Secretariat for Convention on Biological Diversity; 1992. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2022.
  144. Brendler T, Brinckmann JA, Feiter U, et al. Sceletium for managing anxiety, depression and cognitive impairment: A traditional herbal medicine in modern-day regulatory systems. Current Neuropharmacology. 2021;19(9):1384.
  145. Brendler T. EU regulations for herbal products: How do recent changes impact access to the EU market? Planta Medica International Open. 2018;5(S 01):REG05.
  146. Brendler T, Phillips DL. European Union market access categories and regulatory requirements for novel natural products. Novel Plant Bioresources: Applications in Food, Medicine and Cosmetics. 2014107-124.
  147. Brendler T, Phillips DL, Spiess S. A Practical Guide to Licensing Herbal Medicinal Products. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.